Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
About Varied / Hobbyist Insanity123Male/United Kingdom Recent Activity
Deviant for 6 Years
Needs Core Membership
Statistics 259 Deviations 3,655 Comments 18,244 Pageviews
×

Newest Deviations

Favourites

Groups

deviantID

Insanity123

Artist | Hobbyist | Varied
United Kingdom
Sociology, history and film and Television student
In my spare time I take photos.
Interests

AdCast - Ads from the Community

×

Journal History

Comments


Add a Comment:
 
:icondamaimikaz:
DamaiMikaz Featured By Owner Oct 3, 2015  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Thanks for the favorite :)
Reply
:iconerraticbasarafan:
ErraticBASARAfan Featured By Owner Edited Sep 18, 2015  Hobbyist Writer
YOU are not being the professional victim, guy; i never said that; i said, your WideEyedAndWorried mistreß is, with her claims that viewpoints in entertainment were all men's, and implications that society itself was constructed by men to benefit only men at the expense of women. As well, you were making ME out to be professional victim, as i acknowledge. After which i brought up things I do that a professional victim wouldn't. Your cognitive dissonance, on the other hand, comes from a black-and-white logic paradigm and superstitious fundamental tenets like, in this case, Woman Good; Man Bad and, as i've noticed, your desire to be politically correct and shag women aplenty is increasingly irrational.

A Voice For Men has been labelled a hate group AT A FEMINIST WHIM. It's a recognised "hate group" mostly because it takes away from the Feminist narrative of WOMAN GOOD; MAN BAD and exposes female nature's flaws and evils through various experiences by leß-fortunate men. Worse, some men, like Amartya, will indeed try to hijack the cause for various reasons, some believable and selfish, others more outlandish, nigh-unbelievable, and because they are conspiratory. By Feminism's narrative, guy, you too, would be evil, and obliged to removal from the face of the planet.

Paul Elam, whom i don't even know, let alone like, though i hear he'd been scamming his followers out of money, did say some metaphor-based paßages that kinda did match the general behaviour of the average woman from Houston, Texas, at that time.

No; the "Woman Good; Man Bad" narrative regurgitated by Feminists including WideEyedAndWorried herself has zero (or nigh zero) evidence supporting it, and LOADS of evidence against it. Psychiatric labels and the WGMB factoid are politically correct at present, at the whim of the most powerful few (Congress, for instance.) I'm also aware of Woman Right; Man Wrong which is a way more obscene and untrue fundamental of Feminism.
I understand how difficult it is for most of us men to say "no" to a woman's demand. But you leave me no choice; i will make the most drastic mentions yet www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/… www.metronews.fr/info/le-fait-…

Humans are most often hateful and nigh-mindleß denizens under the rule of a powerful few. It's like...our origin isn't Earth but Giedi Prime! It is something that makes ME personally, ashamed to be a human. On the other hand, i might reconsider your stance better if you and WEAW, for starters, cease to use the old "crybaby" charge against those who disagree with you; i haven't used it on you nor WEAW once.
Reply
:iconinsanity123:
Insanity123 Featured By Owner Edited Sep 18, 2015  Hobbyist General Artist
Once again Gimps Mcgee, where am I exhibiting cognitive dissonance. It's all very well parroting again and again "your cognitive dissonance... blah blah blah" like a broken fucking record but you need to provide EVIDENCE in the form of EXAMPLES because failing to do this demonstrates your total lack of understanding about what the hell you're talking about.  

No peabrain, AVFM was labelled a hate group by the southern poverty law centre. You know... Because they feature articles from marital rape apologists, holocaust deniers, and people like Roosh piece of trash V who want to legalise rape on private property. As well as the fact that their founder said this "Should I be called to sit on a jury for a rape trial, I vow publicly to vote not guilty, even in the face of overwhelming evidence that the charges are true." amongst other equally hate-filled shit. So no Gimpy, this isn't a "big ol' feminist conspiracy".  They are a sexist hate group. End of discussion.

Yawn. "wahhhh I'm not a professional victim. You is!!1!!". So bored of that. From now on, everytime you pull that whiny little "b..but I'm not a professional victim" shit, I'm just going to add these quotes, because I'm sick of you banging on about how you're not a professional victim when you clearly are. I'm calling you a crybaby and a professional victim because you are on Gimps McGee. Just look at this shit;

"Ya know, this is how bullies develop" 

"you're behaving like a bully"

"you're giving yourself reasons to hate on people who behave or think differently to you, just like a bully would"

"But i can read your mind, and you're going to actually employ what i've said so it DOES affect me and my reputation adversely. Don't you know the laws about defamation?" (lol. Now that one makes me laugh)

All these quotes can be summarised by this gif

:iconcryingbabyplz:

Wahhhh you're a bully. I'm gonna tell teacher on you. Yeah man. Totally fine to praise boko haram for fucking raping twelve year olds (you're a sick thug Rohan. Get some fucking help), but God forbid you disagree with someone who thinks most women are narcissists. Then you're a bully (proffffeesssssiooooonaaaaalllll viiicccccttttiiiiimmmm)

Nobody is using the women good, men bad narrative. You're creating that narrative because you have very limited understanding of the perceptions, arguments and emotions of other people (due to social developmental issues), thus, in your confusion, you just write whatever narrative is the most simplistic for you. I.e, most women are narcissists, WEAW thinks all men are bad, women belong in prison and so on. I'll ask you this, where did WEAW insinuate that all men are bad? Nowhere. That's a narrative you built because you only understand simplicity. Because we disagree with your fucked up child like mentality of "women belong in prison, most have NPD and yay Boko Haram for enslaving twelve year old girls" doesn't mean we hate men or think all men are bad. It just means we have a brain in our heads and can distinguish a tool when we see on.


You think everyone who disagrees with you thinks all men are bad, even when there is no evidence to suggest such a thinking. This is two things. Firstly, it's argument from ignorance fallacy, (argumentum ad ignorantiam) because your argument lacks any sort of proof. This is also splitting (or black and white thinking/all or nothing thinking). It's a common defence mechanism and the failure to bring together both positive and negative qualities of the self and others into a cohesive, realistic whole.  The individual tends to think in extremes of good and bad with nothing in-between. WEAW disagrees with me, therefore she is the extreme. Therefore she thinks all men are bad. Argument from ignorance fallacy and split thinking. Bravo. 
Reply
:iconerraticbasarafan:
ErraticBASARAfan Featured By Owner Edited Sep 18, 2015  Hobbyist Writer
Not sure you'll believe any actual evidence i give, rather, likely skew it to fit your "Rohan's a professional victim" narrative...but here goes: in pretty much every rebuttal you've written to me (if you'd actually care to revisit and reread them yourself), you combat your cognitive dissonance and inability to understand my point of view, or gray-based (or "fuzzy") logic, by cherry-picking, straw men, ad hominems, argumenta ad populis, and the general argumentum ad ignorantiam. comments.deviantart.com/1/2665… comments.deviantart.com/1/5497… You and your queen bee just want to win. I'm well aware. But unlike you, i have some EMPATHY for those i face in heated conflict. But i'm not exactly Leto Atreides either.

I don't think you understand that Hitler killed more people than just Jews; his victims also included (but were obviously not limited to) Gypsies/Romanies, Poles, non-Nordic-stereotype people (with dark hair or eyes other than blue, or both), and of course political opponents. And the Boko Haram were unhindered from doing what they did THANKS TO NIGERIAN FEMINISTS' OWN INSISTENCE THAT THEY DON'T NEED MEN TO DEFEND THEM, AND FAILING MISERABLY AT FENDING FOR THEMSELVES: www.huffingtonpost.com/nikolas… Oh, and the American President à l'heure, Barack Obama, had a hand in that too.

Oh look, yet another crybaby charge AND an accusation of black-and-white, or split, or all-or-nothing, or one-dimensional mindset, from one who has the latter himself. But black-and-white people like you see "gray" as "black-and-white" and vice versa, and misconstrue everything to fit the black-and-white narrative. I may seem ineducable to you, but listen to you! You are WAY worse. But "crybaby" doesn't fit you either. I'll give ya that, mate. What does fit you, is "ram".

The intel has changed. WEAW does not believe WGMB. She's just a ewe.
Reply
:iconinsanity123:
Insanity123 Featured By Owner Edited Sep 19, 2015  Hobbyist General Artist
Rohan, think. Thinking before you post me a message. Before you send anything. Read it over and think to yourself, will this convince anyone? 

I asked where I am exhibiting cognitive dissonance Rohan. This garbage right here;

"in pretty much every rebuttal you've written to me (if you'd actually care to revisit and reread them yourself), you combat your cognitive dissonance and inability to understand my point of view, or gray-based (or "fuzzy") logic, by cherry-picking, straw men, ad hominems, argumenta ad populis, and the general argumentum ad ignorantiam." 

Does not explain where I am exhibiting cognitive dissonance, now does it Rohan. "you combat your cognitive dissonance with blah blah bah" is not in fact an explanation of how I am exhibiting cognitive dissonance any more than "you combat your narcissism with blah blah bah" isn't an explanation of how or where you're exhibition narcissistic traits. Okay. Now how about you go and pick up a book and learn what cognitive dissonance actually is before you embarrass yourself again and then come back to me, okay.

"I don't think you understand that Hitler killed more people than just Jews; his victims also included (but were obviously not limited to) Gypsies/Romanies, Poles, non-Nordic-stereotype people (with dark hair or eyes other than blue, or both), and of course political opponents. " - :iconsupermindblownplz::iconsupermindblownplz2: What der fuck did that have to do with anything? No really, I read this message five times in the hopes of trying to decrypt what the fuck that bit of random nonsense was. It adds nothing to what you say next. You don't attempt to tie it in with anything. You just sort of dump Hitler randomly into the middle of a message and then move on. Also, I do believe that I read on your youtube page (hilarious by the way), that you identify as anti-Semitic (but then go on to babble about how it's wrongly defined or some equally stupid shit), this becomes increasingly creepy with the understanding that you cook gross looking bread in the shape of a swastika and put random German letters into words. So basically you're a creepy, unlikeable, socially defected, sexist, misogynistic, anti-Semitic, Boko Haram supporting twat. Because that's appealing.

"And the Boko Haram were unhindered from doing what they did THANKS TO NIGERIAN FEMINISTS' OWN INSISTENCE THAT THEY DON'T NEED MEN TO DEFEND THEM, AND FAILING MISERABLY AT FENDING FOR THEMSELVES:"  - Then should you be cheering on the Nigerian feminists? After all you are a paedophile supporter who cheered on what Boko Haram did to those girls and young women. After all, what was it again? Oh that's right "This is not insane in any way. A woman's place is in a prison." In response to an article entitled "Where Are The Missing Nigerian Girls? Boko Haram May Have Just Killed 2,000 People!!! Who Will Stop This Madness?". Always trying to detract with "b..bu der feminists" and never replying to the criticism that of you fucking supporting them. All you do is detract, detract, detract, detract and derail the criticism away from yourself. You fucking supported their actions because in your defect mind, putting women in a cage is good. Why don't you apologise for being a paedophile supporter or at least try to defend your sick sick sick position instead of simply detracting. Again, I would like to draw your attention to this comment that you conveniently ignored;

"Those quotes by me gave an adrenaline rush from the flak i would receive; most of the time the flak was my only desire through those quotes. You could say i just enjoy the notoriety." - So basically you're doing the online equivalent of taking a shit in public in order to garnish attention. So you have traits of histrionic personality disorder basically (doing next to anything to get attention and uncaring about whether the attention is positive or negative). I mean, you might as well be saying "That incident where I did a shit in a public area gave me an adrenaline rush from the flak i would receive; most the time the flak was my only desire through that action. You could say i just enjoy the notoriety". It's the same bullshit attention seeking behaviour Rohan. Oh and also, bullllshhiiitttt. Nobody was leaving comments on those posts arguing. So I see no evidence of "joking to start an argument for attention" (like I said, similar to shitting in public to garnish attention). You were praising BOKO HARAM. A TERRORIST ORGANISATION THAT RAPES CHILDREN. You're a sicko Rohan. That's all you are. A stupid little sexist sicko with mummy problems. I think your sicko posts are 1/3 attention seeking (like a toddler throwing a fit to get attention) and 2/3 an insight to your sick mentality, about what you really think about women and a woman's place. I find it difficult to believe that you disagree with what you said 100% and only wrote it as a saaaaddd grasp for attention. I think there's a part of you that DOES want women in jail. That is pro- what Boko Haram did to those women. Even as an attention seeking tactic Rohan, saying you support Boko Haram and what they did, and are still doing to those girls, is sick. This is why women don't like you Rohan. This is why they avoid you. Not because they're all like "mwah ha ha ha, yeeessss, we shall bleed our period blood over der mens, we shall steal their diamonds and money" and you're just a big hero that stands against that. No, it's because you literally support an organisation that WANTS TO FUCKING RAPE THEM. That's why you retarded freak. 

"Oh look, yet another crybaby charge AND an accusation of black-and-white, or split, or all-or-nothing, or one-dimensional mindset, from one who has the latter himself." - Black and white thinking and one-dimensional mindset are totally different thinkings you fucking idiot. 

"I may seem ineducable to you, but listen to you! You are WAY worse. But "crybaby" doesn't fit you either. I'll give ya that, mate. What does fit you, is "ram"." - I'd rather be a ram or an ewe than a pedo supporter you like. 
Reply
(1 Reply)
Hidden by Commenter
Hidden by Commenter
:iconpiojote:
piojote Featured By Owner May 27, 2015  Professional General Artist
Hi I need say you congratulations for the words in the couter image. you give the truth about this hateful women.  The US dont need someone full of hate.   

Sunset Shimmer EqG (clapping) plz 
Reply
:iconlife-takers-crayons:
Life-takers-crayons Featured By Owner Apr 30, 2015
Thanks for faving :)
Reply
Add a Comment: